#624

  • The Ethiopian asylum seeker, whose arrest for sexually assaulting a woman and a 14-year-old girl sparked protests outside a migrant hotel in Epping, has been jailed for 12 months.

The Spectator evening briefing, September 23, 2025

This is a classic example of the wrong use of a comma. Many people think you should always use one before ‘who’, ‘whose’ or ‘which’, but it depends on the meaning.  In this case the part of the sentence about the arrest defines which asylum seeker you are talking about so no comma is wanted. If on the other hand it was a piece of relevant information which did not define him, for example ‘The Queen, who celebrated her birthday yesterday, was given a bouquet’, you would enclose that clause with commas.

#623

Draper quickly diffused what could have been a tricky encounter, showing his superior quality and experience from the start.

BBC Sport online, June 1, 2025

In the old days I would have been horrified to see this error on the BBC but now I more or less expect it.

From Style Matters:

defuse/diffuse: To defuse means to disable an explosive device by removing the fuse or reduce tension in a confrontation; to diffuse (verb) means to dilute or scatter, as in ‘the sunlight was diffused through the trees’, or it can be used an adjective as in ‘the diffused sunlight’. Watch out for this, as diffuse is often wrongly used in copy when defuse is meant.

#621

The i Paper, February 15, 2025

It would be a sad state of affairs if your readers could not tell the difference between Eric Morecambe and his desk. The obvious way to deal with it is to have a caption under the two pictures on the lines of

Eric Morecambe and the desk at his home

 

#620

The i Paper, February 12, 2025

‘Admittance’ is to do with entering a place as in ‘No admittance’. Confusingly, ‘admission’ can also be used in the same context, as in ‘Admission £12’.  However the two words are not interchangeable when the meaning is ‘confession’, as here. Only ‘admission’ will do.

#618

The i Paper, February 11, 2025

‘Affect’ and ‘effect’ are not synonyms and anyone calling him or herself a sub-editor should be well aware of the difference.

From Style Matters:

affect/effect: To affect (verb) means to produce a result as in ‘cold weather affects the growth of plants’, or to touch the feelings as in ‘she was badly affected by the death of her mother’; effect (verb) is to bring about, as in ‘he effected an improvement’; effect (noun) is a result, as in ‘the effect of poison is death’.

So this should read ‘the effect it would have . . .’

#617

The i Paper, February 10, 2025

Not the first time I have  mentioned this – I dare not check the online dictionaries as by now they are sure to be saying this is correct. It is not – ‘coruscating’ means ‘brilliant’ or ‘dazzling’ as in a diamond. The word for ‘scathing’ which is wanted here is ‘excoriating’.

#616

The i Paper, February 10, 2025

 

This is a new one for me. ‘Reverend’ is an honorific on the lines of ‘Mr’ or ‘Miss’, so this is like saying ‘A mister and Synod member’. What nonsense, and what ignorance. The possible terms that should have been used include ‘vicar’, ‘clergyman’ or ‘priest’.